Back to matrix

S04-PN: Yes

Rationale

PRP Architecture sections 5.4–5.6 place authority in local relationship policy or explicit delegation and require operation from sufficient local relationship information without a mandatory global naming, routing, identity, governance or ledger service. The selected known-peer profile does not add an external service. Participants can therefore administer the necessary policy, keys and communication infrastructure themselves.

Assessment method

Documentary review; no new sleep, load or network execution

Source context

Pinned PRP architecture/lifecycle and primary IP RFCs; retained bytes, 2026-10-15

Outstanding qualification

Documentary capability, not proof of global routing completion or deployed implementation maturity. The compatible native carrier must still be provisioned and access authorized.

Public sources

Editorial evidence references

The following identifiers refer to research records not included in this public package; they are not public links.

• round247-sources.json
• round247-sources.json