S02-RI: Yes

Rationale

Participants can generate and provision the pairwise secret and its identity label locally; no external credential issuer must approve the key.

Assessment method

Documentary composition review; no runtime or sleep experiment

Source context

RPL, ULA, DTLS 1.3 and TLS 1.3 specifications; unchanged IoT profile

Outstanding qualification

Peer acceptance and secure key distribution are still required. This is a symmetric participant identity, not an independently verifiable public-key identity.

Public sources

https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8446.html

Editorial evidence references

The following identifiers refer to research records not included in this public package; they are not public links.

round256-sources.json
round244.html