S01-RA: Yes
Rationale
The documented two-participant Ethernet deployment performs enrollment and application registration using local IPC managers and peer IPC processes. Its configuration names the local DIFs and processes without an indispensable third-party registry, coordinator or approval service. Under S01, counterpart enrollment policy and participant-local management do not constitute a mandatory separate authority.
Assessment method
Primary deployment configuration and architectural dependency inference; no runtime test
Source context
IRATI Ethernet tutorial and retrieved IPC-manager/DIF configurations
Outstanding qualification
Bounded architectural witness for direct local operation, not every federated or globally discovered RINA deployment. Participant provisioning and mutual acceptance remain necessary. Neither self-certifying identity nor absence of local administration follows. No runtime test or security-policy validation was performed.
Public sources
- https://github.com/IRATI/stack/wiki/Tutorial-1:-DIF-over-a-VLAN-(point-to-point-DIF)
- https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wiki/IRATI/stack/configurations/tutorial1/system1/default.dif
- https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wiki/IRATI/stack/configurations/tutorial1/system1/ipcm.conf
Editorial evidence references
The following identifiers refer to research records not included in this public package; they are not public links.
- round652.html