Back to matrix

G01-CX: No

Rationale

For the global case, explicitly select the same conventional BGP-routed IPv4 underlay used for IP, PRP-over-IP and Multipath QUIC. CCNx names, FIB aggregation and pending-Interest state do not remove IP reachability between UDP forwarders in that composition. The whole-stack criterion includes the upstream global prefix tables even when an individual CCNx forwarder only knows its next hop.

Assessment method

Documentary composition and evidence reconciliation; no new runtime execution

Source context

Primary RFCs, explicit deployment convention and retained local experiment receipts

Outstanding qualification

This does not assert that native CCNx or an adjacent-only private IP mesh intrinsically requires global name or prefix tables. Those are different global constructions and have not been selected here. The independent private configuration remains available for S03/S04. No claim is made about a complete catalog of names, global scalability or packet measurements.

Public sources

• https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8569.html
• https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4271.html#section-3.2

Editorial evidence references

The following identifiers refer to research records not included in this public package; they are not public links.

• round119.html
• round279-sources.json