Participant Relationship Protocol

Back to matrix

F39-PN: Yes

Rationale

The protocol author states that PRP endpoints are processes and use the same identity and topological-path abstraction for IPC on the same machine or across machines. Local delivery and remote transport are selected beneath that application abstraction.

Assessment method

Architectural mechanism and primary-source review; author declarations explicitly attributed

Source context

Protocol author clarification: local and remote IPC

Outstanding qualification

Architectural Yes based on the protocol author clarification accepted for this criterion. Local zero-copy is a possible implementation optimization, not a measured or verified property. No executable local/remote equivalence test is asserted.

Public sources

Editorial evidence references

The following identifiers refer to research records not included in this public package; they are not public links.