F38-I2: Yes
Rationale
Independent operators of the IPv4 underlay carrying I2P classify transport aggregates and enforce local resource policies through DiffServ policing, shaping and forwarding classes. Different domain policies coexist under compatible agreements.
Assessment method
Primary specifications and explicit IP policy composition
Source context
IETF AQM and DiffServ; I2P and SCION transport documentation
Outstanding qualification
Optional enforcement is explicit in the profile. Header marking alone is insufficient. This establishes local policy autonomy, not application-level reservation, globally guaranteed QoS or visibility into individual protected conversations.
Public sources
- https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2475.html#section-2.3
- https://www.i2p.net/en/docs/specs/tunnel-implementation/
Editorial evidence references
The following identifiers refer to research records not included in this public package; they are not public links.
- round684.html