Back to matrix

F37-LP: Yes

Rationale

Select router-local AQM in the existing IP transport carrying libp2p UDP packets. Queue pressure is observed at the affected router and congestion-dependent dropping acts there.

Assessment method

Primary QUIC/libp2p documentation and explicit IP policy selection

Source context

libp2p resource management, multipath-21 and IETF transport policies

Outstanding qualification

Optional IP-layer witness, not inferred from generic QUIC end-to-end loss, RTT or path choice. It requires no encrypted stream inspection and guarantees neither delivery nor recovery of upstream capacity. No runtime or universal deployment claim.

Public sources

• https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7567.html#section-2
• https://github.com/libp2p/go-libp2p/blob/master/p2p/host/resource-manager/README.md
• https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9000.html#section-4

Editorial evidence references

The following identifiers refer to research records not included in this public package; they are not public links.

• round683.html