F37-HP: Yes
Rationale
Select router-local AQM in the IP forwarding layer carrying HIP control and ESP-protected user traffic. Local queue-pressure observation triggers congestion-dependent dropping at the affected segment.
Assessment method
Primary RFC review and explicit optional IP transport policy selection
Source context
HIP/Babel specifications and RFC 7567/2475
Outstanding qualification
Explicit optional IP-layer witness. This is not a claim that HIPv2 / ESP itself reports the bottleneck location or that every deployment enables AQM. No measured response time, delivery guarantee or recovery of upstream capacity is inferred.
Public sources
- https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7567.html#section-2
- https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7401.html
- https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7402.html#section-3
Editorial evidence references
The following identifiers refer to research records not included in this public package; they are not public links.
- round682.html