F33-NS: No
Rationale
Basic Nostr provides relay acceptance replies and retrieval of stored events, but NIP-01 specifies no contact-aware retransmission/resumption procedure for an interrupted transfer. WebSocket uses TCP; RFC 6455 section 7.2.3 describes reconnect backoff after abnormal closure, while TCP retains ordinary RTO-based recovery. These mechanisms do not supply the prolonged-contact-interruption adaptation required by F33.
Assessment method
Primary documentary assessment; no runtime test
Source context
Pinned primary specifications; selected-composition inference
Outstanding qualification
Relay storage, later REQ retrieval and application retry remain useful. An OK reply acknowledges relay acceptance, not eventual reader receipt; stored-event retrieval does not itself resume a partially delivered reliable transfer. No additional durable client outbox or recovery extension is selected. This No does not deny offline reading or recovery from ordinary disconnections.
Public sources
- https://raw.githubusercontent.com/nostr-protocol/nips/master/01.md
- https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6455.html#section-7.2.3
- https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6298.html#section-5
Editorial evidence references
The following identifiers refer to research records not included in this public package; they are not public links.
- round479.html
- round479-sources.json