Back to matrix

F32-RI: No

Rationale

6LoWPAN/IPv6/RPL/UDP/DTLS does not select routes using future contact intervals and their usable transfer volumes in the declared composition.

Assessment method

Selected-composition primary documentary assessment; no runtime experiment

Source context

Primary selected transport/routing specifications and declared profile boundary

Outstanding qualification

Selected endpoint leaves use non-storing RPL and pairwise DTLS PSKs; no CoAP, MQTT, object-security or content-service layer is selected. Path preferences, neighbor timers, rank/metric updates, transport flow control and local radio schedules do not by themselves compute temporal route-capacity feasibility. No contact-plan routing extension is selected.

Public sources

• https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6550.html
• https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6554.html
• https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9147.html

Editorial evidence references

The following identifiers refer to research records not included in this public package; they are not public links.

• round469.html
• round469-sources.json