F31-RT: No
Rationale
The selected Resource mechanism retains parts for its chosen link transfer and recovery. Its explicit cache request retrieves a receipt proof for that transfer; it does not expose the retained content as a reusable object to another requester.
Assessment method
Primary specification and pinned-source assessment; no runtime experiment
Source context
Selected-composition documentary boundary; no added application service
Outstanding qualification
The receipt cache is acknowledged rather than treated as absent. Resource payload encryption and requests are link-bound; a node running a new content-serving application could redistribute data, but that is not selected. No LXMF propagation service is imported. This judgment is not a claim that all Reticulum caching is impossible.
Public sources
- https://raw.githubusercontent.com/markqvist/Reticulum/1.5.5/RNS/Resource.py
- https://raw.githubusercontent.com/markqvist/Reticulum/1.5.5/RNS/Link.py
Editorial evidence references
The following identifiers refer to research records not included in this public package; they are not public links.
- round484.html
- round484-sources.json
- round484-plan.json