F31-LI: No
Rationale
LISP forwarding state and queues do not provide reusable content-object storage that satisfies later requests from other consumers.
Assessment method
Primary documentary capability assessment; no new runtime experiment
Source context
Primary protocol specification or pinned implementation; selected-composition assessment
Outstanding qualification
Replication, duplicate suppression, learned addressing and transient buffers alone do not qualify. No additional content cache or custody-serving protocol is selected.
Public sources
Editorial evidence references
The following identifiers refer to research records not included in this public package; they are not public links.
- round468.html
- round468-sources.json