F31-BP: No
Rationale
The selected BP forwarding store retains a bundle for delivery to its designated endpoint and removes retention constraints as processing completes. It supplies no content-cache request/response service for another requester.
Assessment method
Primary specification and pinned-source assessment; no runtime experiment
Source context
Selected-composition documentary boundary; no added application service
Outstanding qualification
Forwarding copies, fragmentation buffers and retry storage remain supported. They do not by themselves match a later content request and serve it from a reusable object. The BP profile allows collective endpoint names, but selects no content-to-supplier binding. The selected pairwise security policies do not grant arbitrary new consumers access; confidentiality alone is not the reason for No. A separately selected cache-serving application or authorized multicast-reuse convention would require a fresh assessment.
Public sources
- https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9171.html#section-5.4
- https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9171.html#section-5.7
- https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9171.html#section-5.11
- https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9172.html
Editorial evidence references
The following identifiers refer to research records not included in this public package; they are not public links.
- round484.html
- round484-sources.json
- round484-plan.json