F27-BP: No
Rationale
BPv7 retains bundles across disrupted connectivity. TCPCLv4 describes persistent, ephemeral and periodic polling policies, negotiates connection parameters and permits session termination. These mechanisms do not specify an agreement on temporal receiver availability windows. Idle termination ends a session rather than agreeing its next communication window.
Assessment method
Primary specification analysis; no runtime experiment
Source context
Primary protocol definitions; bounded selected-composition inference
Outstanding qualification
RFC 9174 sections 3.5, 4.3 and 6, with RFC 9171. Periodic polling and externally arranged policies remain possible; the selected profile has no temporal-agreement extension. This No does not negate DTN retention or planned contacts.
Public sources
Editorial evidence references
The following identifiers refer to research records not included in this public package; they are not public links.
- round462.html
- round462-sources.json