Back to matrix

F24-IL: No

Rationale

ILNP Locator Updates advertise Locator validity and preference, enabling mobility and multihoming. These fields do not define listening opportunities for a sleeping receiver. The selected TCP service likewise supplies flow control and retries rather than a coordinated wake/delivery schedule.

Assessment method

Primary documentary reassessment; no runtime or energy test

Source context

Selected name-routing and transport/control specifications

Outstanding qualification

Neither DNS rendezvous nor preserving an Identifier schedules packet arrival when the radio is awake. No timed delivery custodian or power-saving access mechanism is selected. This preserves the distinction between retaining communication identity through mobility and coordinated reception during planned sleep.

Public sources

• https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6740.html
• https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6743.html#section-2

Editorial evidence references

The following identifiers refer to research records not included in this public package; they are not public links.

• round492.html
• round492-sources.json