F24-I2: No
Rationale
I2P tunnel pools replace expiring tunnels and forward messages through available paths. Tunnel lifetime, anticipatory rebuilding and message throttling regulate tunnel availability and load, not a sleeping receiver schedule. The selected NTCP2/IP composition provides no coordinated wake-time delivery service.
Assessment method
Primary specification and pinned code review; no runtime experiment
Source context
Tor flow control, I2P tunnel operation and GNUnet CADET
Outstanding qualification
Buffering, retransmission and rebuilding after interruption do not by themselves tell a sender when the receiver will listen. The tunnel document identifies its implementation baseline as 0.9.41; the verdict is scoped to the selected composition and documented tunnel contract, not every I2P application or future extension. No additional scheduled access or sleep-aware custodian is selected.
Public sources
Editorial evidence references
The following identifiers refer to research records not included in this public package; they are not public links.
- round504.html
- round504-sources.json