F10-PI: Yes
Rationale
The project comparative whitepaper extension T explicitly includes redundant transmission over independently admitted trajectories while preserving item sequence and context. Retention section 5 separately specifies stable item identity, path-appropriate reprotection and duplicate-delivery prevention, but its activation gate remains open. The redundancy positive is architectural, not proof that a complete wire-v4 duplication policy is implemented or that the retention gate is closed.
Assessment method
Architectural documentary analysis
Source context
Project architecture whitepaper and specification; not runtime qualification
Outstanding qualification
Bind proactive replication and same-item deduplication across independent paths; demonstrate safe nonce/replay handling. Architectural redundancy is not a tested scheduler.
Public sources
Editorial evidence references
The following identifiers refer to research records not included in this public package; they are not public links.
- index.html#prp-review-current