Back to matrix

F09-PN: Yes

Rationale

The project comparative whitepaper explicitly describes balancing over multiple admitted trajectories while preserving one item sequence and context (extension T and capability table). Lifecycle 3.4 permits concurrent eligible paths. This is architectural capability evidence; a concrete wire-v4 scheduler and concurrent payload test remain implementation qualifications.

Assessment method

Architectural documentary analysis

Source context

Project architecture whitepaper and specification; not runtime qualification

Outstanding qualification

Bind concurrent payload scheduling to wire-v4 and validate multiple useful paths; simultaneous eligibility alone is insufficient implementation evidence.

Public sources

Editorial evidence references

The following identifiers refer to research records not included in this public package; they are not public links.

• index.html#prp-review-current