F02-CX: Yes

Rationale

CCNx Interests and Content Objects use content names rather than assigned participant IP addresses at the CCNx layer. The selected known-name composition therefore does not require participant-facing IP allocation.

Assessment method

Documentary capability and suite review; no runtime execution

Source context

Primary HIP/CCNx specifications and unchanged selected profiles

Outstanding qualification

Numeric IPv4/UDP forwarder contacts still need configuration underneath CCNx. Name provisioning, FIB entries and trust are also required; these are not silently removed.

Public sources

https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8569.html

Editorial evidence references

The following identifiers refer to research records not included in this public package; they are not public links.

round254-sources.json
round246.html